Enlightenment, Confusion, Frustration, and Elightened Decisions.

October 22nd, 2009
The expansion of the film meant more interviews. This meant an enlightening wealth of information to build on what we already had in the film.

But with more interviews came more opinions. And this ultimately led to a tug-of-war between those that are for, and those that are against. Who do you listen to? Who is right and who is wrong?

But out of this confusion and subsequent frustration comes one bottom line:

There is growing evidence that cellular technology is harmful to us. This has not been proven, but by the time it could be proven, it could be too late to do something about. So now is the time to err on the side of caution.

2 Responses to “Enlightenment, Confusion, Frustration, and Elightened Decisions.”

  1. Enrico Grani says:
    December 6, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    For society to err on the side of caution is the safest most responsible action to take.

    If we as a global society ignore the warnings of the imminent dangers (of this global EMR experiment) from professional scientists, epidemiologists, biologists, researchers, physicians, neurosurgeons, and anyone else with the education and knowledge to speak out; will humanity survive? We just do not know.

    We are looking forward to viewing “Full signal.” The persons interviewed in this documentary have extensive knowledge and are well respected world wide.

  2. John Andersen says:
    February 26, 2010 at 10:37 pm

    We enjoyed the screening in Portland this past week, and subsequently canceled 3 of our 4 cell phones.

    Our life is noticeably better, not to mention our health. Things are slower. We are talking more.

    Imagine that!

Leave a Reply